X

Cookies

Continue We want you to get the most out of using this website, which is why we and our partners use cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to receive these cookies. You can find out more about how we use cookies here.

Thursday, 23 October 2014

Subscriptions  |  evouchers  |  Jobs  |  Property  |  Motors  |  Travel  |  Dating  |  Family Notices

Cumbria crash driver tried to sleep off eight pints

A BARROW drink-driver who attempted to sleep off eight pints before crashing into a ditch has been banned from driving.

David McInnes, who gave his parents’ address of Mulberry Way, pleaded guilty to drink-driving at Furness Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday.

The court heard how McInnes, 34, had been in Barrow on January 31 where he drank eight pints of bitter in the afternoon before he took a nap in his car and then attempted to drive more than 60 miles to his partner’s home in Appleby.

He was found asleep at the wheel of his car after crashing into a ditch on Birkrigg Common.

Mr John Appleby, prosecuting, told the court it was the second time McInnes had been banned from driving, his first ban was in 2010.

He said: “At about 11.30pm on January 31 McInnes was seen in a vehicle in White Gill Lane, Birkrigg Common, facing towards Bardsea half on the tarmac, half on the grass.

“The headlights were on and the hazard lights were flashing. It was covered in mud up to the lower body work and wheels.”

Mr Appleby told the court McInnes had been drinking in Barrow and slept for around five hours before attempting to drive to his partner’s home.

On his way he crashed into a ditch and burnt out the clutch of the Vauxhall Vectra attempting to drive the car out of the ditch, he called the AA before falling asleep.

Mr Andy Gallagher, defending, told the court McInnes works in the North East where he depends on driving but following the conviction he will be left unemployed.

Mr Bob Fletcher, presiding magistrate, banned McInnes from driving for 36 months and ordered him to pay a fine of £350, court costs of £85 and a £35 victim surcharge.

Have your say

The ban I get, the fine I get, the court costs I get but seems to me the only victim was the defendant so does he pay himself or is the victim surcharge 'pot' just another back door tax the recent crop of governments are so fond of?

Posted by Tony on 20 February 2014 at 17:52

Make your comment

Your name

Your Email

Your Town/City

Your comment


SHARE THIS ARTICLE

North West Evening Mail What's on search










Powered by
nwemail.co.uk/jobs

Hot Jobs

Loading latest hot jobs...
Powered by Zoopla.co.uk






Featured companies

Searching for featured companies...
Search for:

Vote

Should GPs be paid extra each time they diagnose dementia?

Yes

No

Show Result


Reuse

Going digital

World's biggest coffee morning 2014

WCF pet and equestrian

Choosing a pre school

Come and join us 5


To save our contact details direct to your smartphone simply scan this QR code

North West Evening Mail

Evening Mail Going Out