Disgruntled Barrow motorists condemn parking fines after House of Lords fire

SHARE THIS STORY
31 January 2017 9:57PM

A DRIVER who came to the aid of a distressed friend who had been evacuated from her home following a huge blaze in Barrow has been left infuriated after being slapped with a parking fine.

Michelle Wass, of Foundry Street, Barrow, drove to pick up her friend after police evacuated residents in Hawke Street as a safety precaution following a huge fire which engulfed the House of Lords in Abbey Road on January 11.

Keen to support her friend during this upsetting time, the pair took solace in The Range car park from 9.15pm as they waited for updates from the police.

READ MORE: Motorist’s outrage over £100 fine for 23 minutes’ Barrow parking

I will contest it because I think it's bang out of order

Shoppers’ anger as Barrow store gives £100 parking fines

However, despite parking there when the store was shut, controversial car parking system ParkingEye, who run The Range car park, fined Mrs Wass a minimum of £60 for using it out-of-hours.

The 29-year-old said: "The store was closed so I don't know why there was an issue. We didn't get out of the car to view the fire – emergency services were doing their job and we knew that the last thing they needed was more spectators.

"I am definitely not paying it. I will contest it because I think it's bang out of order.

"If they look at the cameras they will see that we never left the car. We couldn't stay on the end of the road because fire engines were using Hawke Street. At the same time, we didn't want to be too far away in case she was allowed back.

"My friend was concerned about her house. At that stage, the roof of the House of Lords was on the verge of collapsing and there were rumours about an explosion. She was really quite distressed and was in a right state."

If Mrs Wass doesn't pay the fine by tomorrow it will increase to £100 and she could be taken to court by ParkingEye, who she has labelled as "bullies".

Mrs Wass added: "I think they have seen lots of cars parking up there and seen an opportunity to make money. They need to take into consideration that people could have lost their homes that night."

Tracey Glover, of Middlefield, Ormsgill, was also left aggrieved when she and her partner, Alan Griffiths, were threatened with a fine after using the car park on the night of the fire.

The 48-year-old said: "My partner is panicking. We haven't got £100. We are both photographers and we did it for a reason. That car park was the only place we could park and there were no barriers to prevent people from parking there.

"We were only there for 20 or 30 minutes and there were about 10 others cars there at the same time as us.

READ MORE: Work starts to secure the burnt-out shell of Barrow building as highways repaint the road

Owner of fire-ravaged iconic Barrow building speaks out for the first time as fire bosses are set to begin investigation

"I think ParkingEye are taking the mick and there are a lot of people who have been stung by this. They haven't taken into context exactly what happened that evening. They are just a business that wants to make money and I think they are lulling people into a false sense of security."

A ParkingEye spokesperson, said: “There are numerous signs at The Range car park informing drivers that parking is prohibited outside store opening hours.

"We encourage people who have received a parking charge to appeal if they think there are mitigating circumstances, and instructions about how to do this are detailed on all communications and on our website.”

Have you also been threatened with a parking fine for using The Range car park on the night of the House of Lords fire? If so get in touch and let us know how you feel about the decision made by ParkingEye.

Comment on this article

Generate a new code
lee   morton , Ireleth Thursday, 09 February, 2017 at 12:15PM
everyone boycott the range until its draconian parking firm is axed
Reply
Reply to this comment

Generate a new code
  Vic   Ketchman , Barrow-in-Furness Tuesday, 07 February, 2017 at 10:33AM
This comment breaches guidelines and was removed by the moderator
Philip   Walduck , Bed Monday, 06 February, 2017 at 5:10AM
If you are still in the vehicle you are not parked. Simple as. Until the driver exits the vehicle you are not parked simply waiting.
Reply
Reply to this comment

Generate a new code
Robert   Corran , Walney Island Thursday, 02 February, 2017 at 12:38PM
Its about time Barrow Council got to grips with Parking Eye and similar companies who take over any vacant land and put parking restrictions on it. Where does the money go certainly not back into paying for the upgrading of Roads and Pavements, I suspect the money goes into some fat cats back pocket and I bet they don't pay tax on it either. However that said ONLY The POLICE and Local Council can fine you for parking offences on official council car parks. Tell Parking Eye to shove their fine where the sun doesn't shine, let them take you to court they will eventually back down because they know they won't win in court and they will end up going away with their tail between their legs..... Google it and see for yourself.
Reply
Reply to this comment

Generate a new code
Marc   Ayres , Barrow Tuesday, 31 January, 2017 at 6:35PM
All you have to do for the appeal is state that they do not have permission from the landowner (not the range) to dish out fines and they have to prove they have permission. Also state that with the store being closed, there is no loss of earnings for the range so the fine is unjust. I fought one two years ago and won on this basis
Reply
Reply to this comment

Generate a new code
Alexander   Smith , Barrow Tuesday, 31 January, 2017 at 2:35PM
Parking Eyes business model is through using the threat of small claims court as a business model. They will argue that the Beavis decision supports these charges at night in a quiet empty car park, good luck with that in front of a judge. At the local court the judged are already fed up of PE'S ambush style evidence packs. They didn't have planning permission for the signs until recently.
Reply
Reply to this comment

Generate a new code
Peter   Koth , Cumbria Tuesday, 31 January, 2017 at 12:08PM
Too many rules and regulations in this town,no wonder people don't come here! What if it had been the Fire Engine- probably got clamped lol!
Reply
Reply to this comment

Generate a new code
Comments not OK? Click here to let us know
Read this..