Barrow curry house host speaks of ill mum plight
Last updated at 11:52, Monday, 20 January 2014
A BARROW restaurant host who narrowly avoided jail after breaching a prohibition order has told how family tragedy had distracted him at the time of the offence.
Ferdous Ahmed, 37, front-of-house man at Mithali restaurant in Dalton Road, appeared at Preston Crown Court last week. He was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay a further £2,000 in costs.
In July last year council inspectors found a staff member sleeping on the second floor, a violation of the prohibition notice.
At that time, Mr Ahmed was already on a suspended sentence for similar fire safety offences.
Mr Ahmed, of Barrow, pleaded guilty, on the basis that for three days he had been running the business because his father, the owner, was incapacitated.
He said: “At the time I was very troubled, and spending a lot of time with my mother and father.
“My mother was suffering with dementia, and has since had to be moved into a care home.
“What happened at the restaurant is extremely unfortunate, but I’m just a very loving person, and I will always prioritise my family.”
When Barrow Borough Council inspected the premises they had found six members of staff sleeping on the first floor – which had no prohibition in place – and one asleep on the second floor.
Both the judge, and the council, said that there had been significant improvements in terms of safety since the first offence.
Mr Ahmed continued: “I did not mean to do anything wrong. I tried my best.
“But I became a failure for caring too much about my mother, with her illness, and my father.
“My mother has been here since the start. She brought us into this business. To see her ill made me lose focus, and I lacked in consideration for the restaurant.”
Mr Ahmed, says that he did not give permission for any staff to sleep on the second floor.
He has since passed control of Mithali over to his brother.
“I just want to get back to what I do best and I hope we can all forget this and look to the future.”
First published at 09:38, Monday, 20 January 2014
Published by http://www.nwemail.co.uk
Have your say
So why does this reason make this chap any different from the rest us? If you do wrong you get punished, for the second time he has put lives at risk in his property by Ignoring Health & Safety, but says He "Cares about his family" at what price to others safety?
If 7 members of staff were found to be sleeping in the floors above the restaurant it is hardly a mistake. The welfare of staff should be paramount, what if there had been a fire? No one would have known there were there, that is why there are health and safety regulations.
View all 6 comments on this article